Mina Accounts & Storage

Alperen Tunçkıran
6 min readOct 24, 2024

--

Exploring Mina’s approach to blockchain storage and how it compares to Ethereum and Solana.

1. Introduction

Blockchain technology has revolutionized the way we think about data storage, security, and decentralization. As the ecosystem evolves, different protocols offer unique solutions to scalability, efficiency, and usability challenges. Mina Protocol stands out with its promise of being the world’s lightest blockchain, maintaining a constant size regardless of network usage. Central to Mina’s design is its approach to account storage — a topic that sparks curiosity and raises questions.

In this article, we’ll delve into Mina’s account storage limitations, understand what can be stored within its 8 field elements, and explore how this compares to other blockchains like Ethereum and Solana. We’ll also discuss the implications of these limitations and strategies developers can use to build effective applications on Mina.

2. What Makes Mina Protocol Unique?

Mina Protocol is designed to address the scalability issues that many blockchains face. Well-known blockchains like Bitcoin and Ethereum grow in size over time, making it increasingly difficult for individuals to run full nodes without significant storage and computational resources.

Bitcoin State Growth

Of course, I don’t even speak about Solana :)

Mina tackles this problem by using advanced cryptography called zk-SNARKs (Zero-Knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Arguments of Knowledge).

Key features of Mina include:

  • Constant Blockchain Size: The entire Mina blockchain remains about 22 kilobytes regardless of the number of transactions.
  • Easy to Verify: Anyone can quickly verify the network without downloading a massive ledger.
  • Enhanced Privacy: zk-SNARKs provide strong privacy guarantees.

Imagine a library where, instead of needing to read every book to understand the history of literature, you have a concise summary that captures the essence of all the books combined.

This is how Mina’s succinct blockchain works, it gives you the full picture without requiring you to process every single detail.

3. Understanding the 8 Field Elements in Accounts of Mina Protocol

In Mina, each account is limited to storing eight field elements, with each element being approximately 32 bytes. This totals about 256 bytes of storage per account. This space includes essential account information like balances and nonces, leaving limited room for custom data.

One SHA256 Hash output takes up 256 bits of memory. You can store only eight SHA256 Hash outputs in a Mina Account.

3.1 What Is a Field Element?

A field element is a number within a finite field used in cryptographic computations. In Mina, field elements are fundamental to maintaining the blockchain’s succinctness through zk-SNARKs.

3.2 Why the Limit?

  • Efficiency: Smaller account sizes make it faster and less resource-intensive to generate and verify zk-SNARK proofs.
  • Accessibility: Keeps the blockchain lightweight, allowing more people to run full nodes on standard devices like laptops or even smartphones.
  • Security: Reduces the attack surface by limiting the amount of data that can be manipulated on-chain.

Think of the eight field elements like a small backpack. You can only carry essential items, so you have to pack smartly. This encourages you to bring only what you need and find creative ways to make the most of the space.

4. What Can You Store in These 8 Fields?

Despite the limited storage, you can still store meaningful data by efficiently encoding information. Here’s how you can utilize the eight field elements, along with real-life examples.

4.1 Storing Simple Variables

You can store basic data types such as integers, booleans, and small strings.

  • Counters and Nonces: Track the number of times an account has performed a specific action, like the number of votes cast in a decentralized voting system.
  • Flags and Status Indicators: A boolean value indicating whether a user is an active member or if a feature is enabled.

In a membership club, you might have a member ID (integer) and a status flag indicating if the membership is active or expired (boolean).

4.2 Access Control and Permissions

Use bits within a field to represent different permissions or roles.

  • User Roles: Assign roles like admin, editor, or viewer by setting specific bits in a field.
  • Feature Access: Control access to premium features in a decentralized application (dApp).

In a software application, a license key might enable or disable features based on the bits set in the key code.

4.3 References to Off-Chain Data

Store hashes or identifiers that reference larger datasets stored off-chain.

  • Content Identifiers (CIDs): Store a hash that points to data on the InterPlanetary File System (IPFS).
  • Merkle Roots: Save the root hash of a Merkle tree representing a large set of data, allowing verification without storing all the data on-chain.

Think of a tracking number for a package. The tracking number (hash) lets you access detailed delivery information stored elsewhere.

4.4 Compact Data Encoding

Use custom encoding schemes to pack more information into fewer bytes.

  • Bit Fields: Use individual bits to represent multiple boolean values, such as feature toggles or settings.
  • Packed Integers: Combine several small integers into a single field by allocating a specific number of bits to each.

Consider a single barcode that contains encoded information about a product, like its ID, price, and expiration date.

5. Comparing Mina with Ethereum and Solana

To better understand Mina’s approach, let’s see how it stacks up against Ethereum and Solana in terms of account storage and capabilities.

5.1 Ethereum

  • Storage Model: Unlimited storage per smart contract (limited by gas costs).
  • Capabilities: Can store large amounts of data, making it suitable for complex applications like decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and games.

Ethereum is like a cargo ship, you can carry a lot, but it’s slow and requires significant resources to operate.

5.2 Solana

  • Storage Model: Each account can store up to approximately 10 MB of data.
  • Capabilities: High throughput and larger storage make it suitable for data-intensive applications like high-frequency trading platforms.

Solana is like a freight train, fast and capable of carrying substantial loads but needs strong infrastructure.

5.3 Mina

  • Storage Model: Strict limit of eight field elements per account (~256 bytes).
  • Capabilities: Ideal for applications where minimal on-chain data is acceptable, and privacy and efficiency are prioritized.
  • Trade-Offs: Limited storage requires innovative approaches to application design.

Mina is like a bicycle, lightweight and accessible to everyone, but you have to pack light.

6. Advantages and Disadvantages of Mina’s Storage Model

6.1 Advantages

  • Accessibility: Anyone can participate in the network without specialized hardware.
  • Efficiency: Quick verification times and low resource consumption.
  • Privacy: Enhanced through zk-SNARKs, allowing for confidential transactions.

6.2 Disadvantages

  • Limited On-Chain Functionality: Can’t support data-heavy applications directly on-chain.
  • Complex Development: Requires reliance on off-chain storage solutions and more complex application logic.
  • Learning Curve: Developers need to adopt new paradigms for efficient data encoding and storage.

7. Conclusion

Mina Protocol offers a refreshing take on blockchain design by emphasizing succinctness and accessibility. While the eight field element limit per account presents challenges, it also encourages innovative solutions and efficient coding practices. By understanding how to work within these constraints, developers can build secure, private, and decentralized applications that leverage Mina’s strengths.

Comparing Mina to Ethereum and Solana highlights the diversity of approaches in the blockchain ecosystem. Each platform has its trade-offs, and the best choice depends on the specific needs of the application being developed.

Mina’s limitations are not just hurdles but opportunities to rethink how we approach blockchain development.

Thanks for reading. Follow me on X to catch up next articles.

My X account : @blockofchain

--

--

No responses yet